↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Prospective Multicenter Experience With Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Using High Impedance Irrigant to Target Deep Myocardial Substrate Refractory to Standard Ablation

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Prospective Multicenter Experience With Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Using High Impedance Irrigant to Target Deep Myocardial Substrate Refractory to Standard Ablation
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.06.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duy T Nguyen, Wendy S Tzou, Amneet Sandhu, Carola Gianni, Elad Anter, Roderick Tung, Miguel Valderrábano, Patrick Hranitzky, Kyoko Soeijma, Luis Saenz, Fermin C Garcia, Usha B Tedrow, John M Miller, Edward P Gerstenfeld, J David Burkhardt, Andrea Natale, William H Sauer

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using half-normal saline (HNS) as the cooling radiofrequency ablation (RFA) irrigant among patients who had failed prior, standard RFA. Effective control of ventricular arrhythmias that arise from mid-myocardium may be refractory to standard RFA. Recent data suggest that delivering fluid with decreased ionic concentration during open-irrigated RFA can produce deeper RFA lesions. A 12-center prospective analysis was performed of all ablations using HNS for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias (premature ventricular complex [PVC]/ventricular tachycardia [VT]) refractory to standard ablation with normal saline irrigant. HNS RFA was used clinically to target 94 PVC/VTs refractory to standard ablation. Acute success was achieved in 78 of 94 (83%), with longer-term success occurring in 78 subjects after a mean follow-up of 6.1 ± 6.7 months (range, 3.0 to 25.2 months). Steam pops were observed among 12 (12.6%) patients. There were no significant changes in electrolytes measured before and after the use of HNS, and there were no complications related to HNS use. The use of HNS instead of normal saline irrigant during high-power delivery targeting deep myocardial substrate is safe and effective. PVC/VT sources previously unaffected by standard ablation may be successfully ablated with improved efficiency of radiofrequency delivery using HNS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Engineering 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,663,106
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#382
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,319
of 344,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#13
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.