Title |
Development of an efficient plant regeneration system for Russian wildrye (Psathyrostachys juncea)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Cell Reports, February 2002
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00299-001-0410-3 |
Authors |
Z. Wang, D. Lehmann, J. Bell, A. Hopkins |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 67% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,707,189
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#317
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,377
of 123,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.