↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of inpatient vs. outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective case series

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of inpatient vs. outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective case series
Published in
BMC Surgery, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-9-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey T Liu, Rudy P Briner, Jonathan A Friedman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 18%
Student > Postgraduate 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,298,249
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#880
of 1,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,726
of 93,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them