↓ Skip to main content

Midface toddler excoriation syndrome (MiTES) can be caused by autosomal recessive biallelic mutations in a gene for congenital insensitivity to pain, PRDM12

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Dermatology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Midface toddler excoriation syndrome (MiTES) can be caused by autosomal recessive biallelic mutations in a gene for congenital insensitivity to pain, PRDM12
Published in
British Journal of Dermatology, September 2018
DOI 10.1111/bjd.16893
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Moss, S.M. Srinivas, N. Sarveswaran, M. Nahorski, V.K. Gowda, F.M. Browne, G. Woods

Abstract

Midface toddler excoriation syndrome (MiTES) is a condition recently reported in three unrelated children. Habitual scratching from the first year of life inflicted deep, chronic, scarring wounds around the nose and eyes. One child had a mild neurological deficit but there was no other evidence of insensitivity to pain. Bilateral distribution and localization to the midface distinguish MiTES from other causes of self-inflicted skin damage such as trigeminal trophic syndrome. An earlier study of five siblings from a consanguineous Irish family, with lesions corresponding to MiTES plus other sensory deficits, showed homozygous mutations in a gene for hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type VIII (HSAN8), PRDM12. To study further cases of MiTES, including analysis of PRDM12. We describe five further children, from four families, with facial lesions typical of MiTES, in whom mutation analysis of PRDM12 was carried out. Homozygous or compound heterozygous pathogenic expansions of the PRDM12 polyalanine tract were found in four of five affected individuals, in three families. Our finding of autosomal recessive mutations in PRDM12 in four of five patients with MiTES extends the phenotypic spectrum of PRDM12 mutations, which usually cause HSAN8, characterized by mutilating self-inflicted wounds of the extremities, lips and tongue. By contrast, MiTES shows severe midfacial lesions with little if any evidence of generalized pain insensitivity. The condition is probably genetically heterogeneous, and other congenital insensitivity to pain and HSAN genes such as SCN11A may be implicated. This new understanding of the nature of MiTES, which can masquerade as factitious disease, will facilitate appropriate management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,104,383
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Dermatology
#1,581
of 9,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,919
of 335,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Dermatology
#26
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.