↓ Skip to main content

Seeking support after hospitalisation for injury: a nested qualitative study of the role of primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seeking support after hospitalisation for injury: a nested qualitative study of the role of primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2015
DOI 10.3399/bjgp15x688141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Christie, Kate Beckett, Sarah Earthy, Blerina Kellezi, Jude Sleney, Jo Barnes, Trevor Jones, Denise Kendrick

Abstract

In the UK, studies suggest that the transition from hospital to home after an injury can be a difficult time and many patients report feeling inadequately prepared. Patients often use primary care services after hospital discharge. These consultations provide opportunities to consider problems that patients experience and to facilitate recovery. Little is known, however, about how patients and service providers view care after hospital discharge and the role played by primary care services, specifically GPs. To identify good practice and unmet needs in respect of post-discharge support for injured patients. Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews at four sites (Bristol, Leicester/Loughborough, Nottingham, and Surrey). Qualitative interviews with 40 service providers and 45 hospitalised injured patients. Although there were examples of well-managed hospital discharges, many patients felt they were not provided with the information they needed about their injury, what to expect in terms of recovery, pain control, return to work, psychological problems, and services to help meet their needs. They also described difficulty accessing services such as physiotherapy or counselling. Service providers identified problems with communication between secondary and primary care, lack of access to physiotherapy, poor communication about other services that may help patients, GP service and resource constraints, and difficulties in providing information to patients concerning likely prognosis. Discharge from hospital after an injury can be problematic for patients. Changes in both secondary and primary care are required to resolve this problem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 24%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,193,839
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,059
of 4,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,054
of 388,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#17
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.