| Title |
Beyond eCK: perfect forward secrecy under actor compromise and ephemeral-key reveal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Designs, Codes and Cryptography, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10623-013-9852-1 |
| Authors |
Cas Cremers, Michèle Feltz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 28 | 64% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#44
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,635
of 197,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them