You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Drug Target Commons 2.0: a community platform for systematic analysis of drug–target interaction profiles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/database/bay083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
ZiaurRehman Tanoli, Zaid Alam, Markus Vähä-Koskela, Balaguru Ravikumar, Alina Malyutina, Alok Jaiswal, Jing Tang, Krister Wennerberg, Tero Aittokallio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,788,732
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation
#313
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,978
of 351,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.