↓ Skip to main content

Supraspinatus tendon repair using anchors: a biomechanical evaluation in the rabbit

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Supraspinatus tendon repair using anchors: a biomechanical evaluation in the rabbit
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13018-018-0773-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hakim Louati, Hans K. Uhthoff, Kathryn Culliton, Odette Laneuville, Peter Lapner, Guy Trudel

Abstract

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs are mostly secured with suture anchors and often supplemented by footprint decortication. The objectives of this study were to characterize the strength of bone-tendon healing following anchor repair and assess the effect of channeling the supraspinatus (SSP) humeral footprint 1 week ahead of reattachment surgery. One hundred twelve rabbits underwent unilateral detachment of one SSP tendon and were randomly assigned to two groups: channeling the footprint at time of detachment and no channeling. One week later, reattachment was performed using an anchor. The repaired and contralateral shoulders were harvested at 0, 1, 2, or 4 weeks after repair and mechanically tested to failure. Outcome measures included load at failure, stiffness, and site of failure. Anchor fixation had a mean load at failure of 81 ± 32 N and a stiffness of 27 ± 9 N/mm immediately after repair compared to 166 ± 47 N and 66 ± 13 N/mm in the contralateral (both p < 0.05). Mechanical recovery of the reattached SSP tendon was achieved after 4 weeks (221 ± 73 N, 206 ± 59 N, and 198 ± 49 N in the channeling, no channeling, and contralateral groups, respectively, p > 0.05). The dominant site of failure shifted from the footprint at 0/1 week to bone avulsion/mid-substance tear at 4 weeks (p < 0.05). There were no differences in outcomes between the channeling and no channeling groups. This study is the first of its kind to provide quantitative data on the mechanical properties of the enthesis following anchor repair in a rabbit model. Anchor repair led to rapid and complete restoration of SSP mechanical properties. Further evidence is needed before recommending channeling ahead of repair surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,545,785
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#666
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,775
of 330,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.