You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Considering axiological integrity: a methodological analysis of qualitative evidence syntheses, and its implications for health professions education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Health Sciences Education, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10459-018-9829-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Kelly, Rachel H. Ellaway, Helen Reid, Heather Ganshorn, Sarah Yardley, Deirdre Bennett, Tim Dornan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 28% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,327,980
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#398
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,243
of 326,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.