↓ Skip to main content

Pain language and gender differences when describing a past pain event

Overview of attention for article published in Pain (03043959), July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pain language and gender differences when describing a past pain event
Published in
Pain (03043959), July 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2009.05.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Strong, T. Mathews, R. Sussex, F. New, S. Hoey, G. Mitchell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Psychology 15 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Linguistics 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,405,975
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pain (03043959)
#701
of 6,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,125
of 125,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain (03043959)
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.