↓ Skip to main content

Generalizing screen inferiority - does the medium, screen versus paper, affect performance even with brief tasks?

Overview of attention for article published in Metacognition and Learning, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 230)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Generalizing screen inferiority - does the medium, screen versus paper, affect performance even with brief tasks?
Published in
Metacognition and Learning, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11409-015-9150-6
Authors

Yael Sidi, Yael Ophir, Rakefet Ackerman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 34 26%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 22%
Social Sciences 20 16%
Linguistics 7 5%
Computer Science 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 7 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 41 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,550,591
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Metacognition and Learning
#48
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,621
of 393,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metacognition and Learning
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.