↓ Skip to main content

How Multiple Social Identities Are Related to Creativity

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Multiple Social Identities Are Related to Creativity
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, December 2015
DOI 10.1177/0146167215619875
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niklas K. Steffens, Małgorzata A. Gocłowska, Tegan Cruwys, Adam D. Galinsky

Abstract

The present research examined whether possessing multiple social identities (i.e., groups relevant to one's sense of self) is associated with creativity. In Study 1, the more identities individuals reported having, the more names they generated for a new commercial product (i.e., greater idea fluency). In Study 2, multiple identities were associated with greater fluency and originality (mediated by cognitive flexibility, but not by persistence). Study 3 validated these findings using a highly powered sample. We again found that multiple identities increase fluency and originality, and that flexibility (but not persistence) mediated the effect on originality. Study 3 also ruled out several alternative explanations (self-affirmation, novelty seeking, and generalized persistence). Across all studies, the findings were robust to controlling for personality, and there was no evidence of a curvilinear relationship between multiple identities and creativity. These results suggest that possessing multiple social identities is associated with enhanced creativity via cognitive flexibility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 161 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 28%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 29 17%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Linguistics 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 34 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,295,037
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#786
of 2,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,142
of 399,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.