↓ Skip to main content

Targeting Toll-Like Receptors for Cancer Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Targeted Oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Targeting Toll-Like Receptors for Cancer Therapy
Published in
Targeted Oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11523-018-0589-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc J. Braunstein, John Kucharczyk, Sylvia Adams

Abstract

The immune system encompasses a broad array of defense mechanisms against foreign threats, including invading pathogens and transformed neoplastic cells. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are critically involved in innate immunity, serving as pattern recognition receptors whose stimulation leads to additional innate and adaptive immune responses. Malignant cells exploit the natural immunomodulatory functions of TLRs, expressed mainly by infiltrating immune cells but also aberrantly by tumor cells, to foster their survival, invasion, and evasion of anti-tumor immune responses. An extensive body of research has demonstrated context-specific roles for TLR activation in different malignancies, promoting disease progression in certain instances while limiting cancer growth in others. Despite these conflicting roles, TLR agonists have established therapeutic benefits as anti-cancer agents that activate immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and facilitate the expression of cytokines that allow for infiltration of anti-tumor lymphocytes and the suppression of oncogenic signaling pathways. This review focuses on the clinical application of TLR agonists for cancer treatment. We also highlight agents that are undergoing development in clinical trials, including investigations of TLR agonists in combination with other immunotherapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Chemistry 8 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,518,756
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Targeted Oncology
#89
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,021
of 341,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Targeted Oncology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.