You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coffee and caffeine consumption and the risk of hypertension in postmenopausal women 1 , 2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.115.120147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jinnie J Rhee, FeiFei Qin, Haley K Hedlin, Tara I Chang, Chloe E Bird, Oleg Zaslavsky, JoAnn E Manson, Marcia L Stefanick, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer |
| Abstract |
The associations of coffee and caffeine intakes with the risk of incident hypertension remain controversial. We sought to assess longitudinal relations of caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and total caffeine intakes with mean blood pressure and incident hypertension in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. In a large prospective study, type and amount of coffee and total caffeine intakes were assessed by using self-reported questionnaires. Hypertension status was ascertained by using measured blood pressure and self-reported drug-treated hypertension. The mean intakes of caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and caffeine were 2-3 cups/d, 1 cup/d, and 196 mg/d, respectively. Using multivariable linear regression, we examined the associations of baseline intakes of caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and caffeine with measured systolic and diastolic blood pressures at annual visit 3 in 29,985 postmenopausal women who were not hypertensive at baseline. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate HRs and their 95% CIs for time to incident hypertension. During 112,935 person-years of follow-up, 5566 cases of incident hypertension were reported. Neither caffeinated coffee nor caffeine intake was associated with mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure, but decaffeinated coffee intake was associated with a small but clinically irrelevant decrease in mean diastolic blood pressure. Decaffeinated coffee intake was not associated with mean systolic blood pressure. Intakes of caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and caffeine were not associated with the risk of incident hypertension (P-trend > 0.05 for all). In summary, these findings suggest that caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and caffeine are not risk factors for hypertension in postmenopausal women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| India | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 39% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 26% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,684,181
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2,927
of 12,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,679
of 395,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#43
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.