You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Candida Species
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3052-4 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3051-7, 978-1-4939-3052-4
|
| Authors |
Richard Calderone, Ronald Cihlar |
| Editors |
Calderone, Richard, Cihlar, Ronald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Russia | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 35 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,037,962
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,130
of 13,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,652
of 396,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#245
of 1,472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.