↓ Skip to main content

E. E. Just and Creativity in Science. The Importance of Diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of African American Studies, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
E. E. Just and Creativity in Science. The Importance of Diversity
Published in
Journal of African American Studies, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12111-015-9305-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Malcolm Byrnes

Abstract

Renowned biologist Ernest Everett Just (1883-1941) was an outspoken advocate for the classical embryologist's view of the cell; he believed that all the parts of the cell, but especially the cytoplasm, have important roles to play in the process of development, whereby a one-celled zygote becomes a many-celled animal. In opposition to geneticist Thomas Hunt Morgan, Just formulated a hypothesis for how the cell works in development, one that gave a more dominant role to cytoplasmic (instead of nuclear) factors. This paper argues that, in creating his hypothesis, Just applied insights from the African American intellectual community in which he was immersed, much as Charles Darwin applied insights from British political economist Thomas R. Malthus in formulating his theory of evolution by natural selection. This in no way diminishes the scientific validity of Just's (or Darwin's) hypothesis. Rather, it highlights Just's creativity and, as such, points to the importance of having diversity in science.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%