| Title |
The Influence of Social Networks on Patients’ Attitudes Toward Type II Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Community Health, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10900-011-9366-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nandini Mani, Enrico Caiola, Robert J. Fortuna |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,062,676
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#126
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,001
of 186,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.