↓ Skip to main content

Differential DNA Methylation Analysis without a Reference Genome

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential DNA Methylation Analysis without a Reference Genome
Published in
Cell Reports, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Klughammer, Paul Datlinger, Dieter Printz, Nathan C. Sheffield, Matthias Farlik, Johanna Hadler, Gerhard Fritsch, Christoph Bock

Abstract

Genome-wide DNA methylation mapping uncovers epigenetic changes associated with animal development, environmental adaptation, and species evolution. To address the lack of high-throughput methods for DNA methylation analysis in non-model organisms, we developed an integrated approach for studying DNA methylation differences independent of a reference genome. Experimentally, our method relies on an optimized 96-well protocol for reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), which we have validated in nine species (human, mouse, rat, cow, dog, chicken, carp, sea bass, and zebrafish). Bioinformatically, we developed the RefFreeDMA software to deduce ad hoc genomes directly from RRBS reads and to pinpoint differentially methylated regions between samples or groups of individuals (http://RefFreeDMA.computational-epigenetics.org). The identified regions are interpreted using motif enrichment analysis and/or cross-mapping to annotated genomes. We validated our method by reference-free analysis of cell-type-specific DNA methylation in the blood of human, cow, and carp. In summary, we present a cost-effective method for epigenome analysis in ecology and evolution, which enables epigenome-wide association studies in natural populations and species without a reference genome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 29%
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 24%
Computer Science 6 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 27 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,710,775
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#3,912
of 13,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,881
of 396,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#58
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.