| Title |
Mind-Reading or Misleading? Assessing Direct-to-Consumer Electroencephalography (EEG) Devices Marketed for Wellness and Their Ethical and Regulatory Implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s41465-018-0091-2 |
| Authors |
Anna Wexler, Robert Thibault |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 12 | 11% |
| Psychology | 12 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#765,475
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
#16
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,736
of 347,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.