↓ Skip to main content

Function of a Novel Cadmium-Induced YodA Protein in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Current Microbiology, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Function of a Novel Cadmium-Induced YodA Protein in Escherichia coli
Published in
Current Microbiology, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00284-006-0516-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatjana Stojnev, Jana Harichová, Peter Ferianc, Thomas Nyström

Abstract

Cells of Escherichia coli increase greatly the synthesis of a small primarily cytoplasmic protein as soon as the cell growth rate falls below the maximal growth rate supported by cadmium exposure, after which the mature product is exported to the periplasm. This protein was previously identified as the product of the E. coli yodA open reading frame. We now report the isolation of an E. coli mutant defective in YodA synthesis because of insertional inactivation of the corresponding gene. In experiments to test the ability of both the wild-type and yodA mutant E. coli cells to bind cadmium, we have used gamma-labeled [(109)Cd]. Whereas the wild-type E. coli strain was able to bind metal, the yodA mutant strain failed to do so. In addition, analysis of such a mutant demonstrated that it grows at a rate distinguishable from that of the isogenic parent in the presence of cadmium ions. However, challenging cells with hydrogen peroxide and additional metals such as zinc, copper, cobalt, and nickel did not significantly affect the growth rate of the mutant. This growth phenotype was found to be the result of the loss of its ability to bind cadmium. These results suggest that the role of YodA protein might be to decrease the concentration level of cadmium ions in E. coli cells during cadmium stress by its ability to bind heavy metal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 17%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2011.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#1,400
of 2,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,575
of 67,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#23
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,395 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.