| Title |
Citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: an updated meta-analysis of RCTs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-4099-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming Bai, Meilan Zhou, Lijie He, Feng Ma, Yangping Li, Yan Yu, Pengbo Wang, Li Li, Rui Jing, Lijuan Zhao, Shiren Sun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 27% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2020.
All research outputs
#20,575,286
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,927
of 5,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,845
of 299,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#54
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.