↓ Skip to main content

Spatial distribution of orally administered viral fusolin protein in the insect midgut and possible synergism between fusolin and digestive proteases to disrupt the midgut peritrophic matrix

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Spatial distribution of orally administered viral fusolin protein in the insect midgut and possible synergism between fusolin and digestive proteases to disrupt the midgut peritrophic matrix
Published in
Archives of Virology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00705-018-4013-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wataru Mitsuhashi, Sachiko Shimura, Kazuhisa Miyamoto, Takafumi N. Sugimoto

Abstract

Oral inoculation of entomopoxvirus spindles, microstructures composed of fusolin protein, causes disruption of the peritrophic matrix (PM), a physical barrier against microbe infection, in the insect midgut. Although the atomic structure of fusolin has been determined, little has been directly elucidated of the mechanism of disruption of the PM. In the present study, we first performed an immunohistochemical examination to determine whether fusolin acts on the PM directly or indirectly in the midgut of Bombyx mori larvae that were inoculated with spindles of Anomala cuprea entomopoxvirus. This revealed that the PM, rather than the midgut cells, was the attachment site for fusolin. Fusolin broadly attached to the PM from the anterior to the posterior region, both to its ectoperitrophic and endoperitrophic surfaces and within the PM. These results likely explain why the whole of the PM is rapidly disintegrated. Second, we administered protease inhibitors mixed with spindles and observed decreased midgut protease activity and reduced disruption of the PM. This suggests that midgut protease(s) is also positively involved in PM disruption. Based on the present results, we propose an overall mechanism for the disruption of the PM by administration of fusolin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,782
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#3,421
of 4,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,102
of 341,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#61
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.