↓ Skip to main content

A history of the term “DMARD”

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammopharmacology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 533)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
A history of the term “DMARD”
Published in
Inflammopharmacology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10787-015-0232-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonas Kure Buer

Abstract

The article outlines a history of the concept of "disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs" or DMARDs-from the emergence in the 1970s of the idea of drugs with decisive long-term effects on bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), through the consolidation and popularisation in the term DMARD in 1980s and 1990s. It then examines the usage of the terms "remission-inducing drugs" (RIDs) and "slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs" (SAARDs), which for some years offered competition to the term DMARDs, thus underscoring the contingency of the establishment of DMARD as a word. Finally, it juxtaposes the apparently spontaneous emergence of the three terms DMARD, SAARD and RID, and the disappearance of the latter two, with a failed attempt in the early 1990s to replace these terms with the new term "disease-controlling antirheumatic treatment" (DC-ART). The analysis highlights the paradoxical qualities of the DMARD concept as robust albeit tension ridden, while playing down the role of identified individuals and overarching explanations of purpose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,233,622
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Inflammopharmacology
#31
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,886
of 267,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammopharmacology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.