↓ Skip to main content

Intra-colonial foraging specialism by honey bees (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera:Apidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, May 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Intra-colonial foraging specialism by honey bees (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera:Apidae)
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, May 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00170594
Authors

Benjamin P. Oldroyd, Thomas E. Rinderer, Steven M. Buco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,389
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,747
of 19,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.