↓ Skip to main content

RNA interference to enhance radiation therapy: Targeting the DNA damage response

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Letters, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNA interference to enhance radiation therapy: Targeting the DNA damage response
Published in
Cancer Letters, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.09.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Ratnayake, A.L. Bain, N. Fletcher, C.B. Howard, K.K. Khanna, K.J. Thurecht

Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) therapy is an emerging class of biopharmaceutical that has immense potential in cancer medicine. RNAi medicines are based on synthetic oligonucleotides that can suppress a target protein in tumour cells with high specificity. This review explores the attractive prospect of using RNAi as a radiosensitizer by targeting the DNA damage response. There are a multitude of molecular targets involved in the detection and repair of DNA damage that are suitable for this purpose. Recent developments in delivery technologies such nanoparticle carriers and conjugation strategies have allowed RNAi therapeutics to enter clinical trials in the treatment of cancer. With further progress, RNAi targeting of the DNA damage response may hold great promise in guiding radiation oncology into the era of precision medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 30%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Energy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Letters
#4,750
of 6,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,386
of 351,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Letters
#34
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.