| Title |
Lotteries as Disguised, Regressive, and Counterproductive Taxes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11469-010-9269-2 |
| Authors |
Rick Wolff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 36% |
| Researcher | 4 | 36% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#380
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,703
of 96,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them