↓ Skip to main content

Air pollution and fasting blood glucose: A longitudinal study in China

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Air pollution and fasting blood glucose: A longitudinal study in China
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linping Chen, Yong Zhou, Shanshan Li, Gail Williams, Haidong Kan, Guy B. Marks, Lidia Morawska, Michael J. Abramson, Shuohua Chen, Taicheng Yao, Tianbang Qin, Shouling Wu, Yuming Guo

Abstract

Limited studies have examined the associations between air pollutants [particles with diameters of 10μm or less (PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)] and fasting blood glucose (FBG). We collected data for 27,685 participants who were followed during 2006 and 2008. Generalized Estimating Equation models were used to examine the effects of air pollutants on FBG while controlling for potential confounders. We found that increased exposure to NO2, SO2 and PM10 was significantly associated with increased FBG levels in single pollutant models (p<0.001). For exposure to 4days' average of concentrations, a 100μg/m(3) increase in SO2, NO2, and PM10 was associated with 0.17mmol/L (95% CI: 0.15-0.19), 0.53mmol/L (95% CI: 0.42-0.65), and 0.11mmol/L (95% CI: 0.07-0.15) increase in FBG, respectively. In the multi-pollutant models, the effects of SO2 were enhanced, while the effects of NO2 and PM10 were alleviated. The effects of air pollutants on FBG were stronger in female, elderly, and overweight people than in male, young and underweight people. In conclusion, the findings suggest that air pollution increases the levels of FBG. Vulnerable people should pay more attention on highly polluted days to prevent air pollution-related health issues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#22,280
of 29,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,623
of 287,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#161
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.