↓ Skip to main content

Comparisons among the five ground-motion models developed using RESORCE for the prediction of response spectral accelerations due to earthquakes in Europe and the Middle East

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Comparisons among the five ground-motion models developed using RESORCE for the prediction of response spectral accelerations due to earthquakes in Europe and the Middle East
Published in
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9522-8
Authors

John Douglas, Sinan Akkar, Gabriele Ameri, Pierre-Yves Bard, Dino Bindi, Julian J. Bommer, Sanjay Singh Bora, Fabrice Cotton, Boumédiène Derras, Marcel Hermkes, Nicolas Martin Kuehn, Lucia Luzi, Marco Massa, Francesca Pacor, Carsten Riggelsen, M. Abdullah Sandıkkaya, Frank Scherbaum, Peter J. Stafford, Paola Traversa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 42%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 31%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#269
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,266
of 206,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.