↓ Skip to main content

Application of wave field continuation to the inversion of refraction data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of wave field continuation to the inversion of refraction data
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1029/jb087ib02p00927
Authors

George A. McMechan, Robert W. Clayton, Walter D. Mooney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 46%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 85%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,545
of 188,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#1,133
of 4,350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.