↓ Skip to main content

Reflective Functioning as Predictor of Working Alliance and Outcome in the Treatment of Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflective Functioning as Predictor of Working Alliance and Outcome in the Treatment of Depression
Published in
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, January 2016
DOI 10.1037/ccp0000055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika Ekeblad, Fredrik Falkenström, Rolf Holmqvist

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 109 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,936,467
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#3,054
of 4,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,236
of 405,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#25
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.