↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Motivation and the Duration of Partnership

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
266 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sexual Motivation and the Duration of Partnership
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, June 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1015205020769
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dietrich Klusmann

Abstract

The variation of sexual motivation with duration of partnership is analyzed in data from a survey of German students. The sample of 1865 includes only students aged 19-32 who reported to be heterosexual and to live in a steady partnership. Main results are (1) sexual activity and sexual satisfaction decline in women and men as the duration of partnership increases; (2) sexual desire only declines in women; and (3) desire for tenderness declines in men and rises in women. Because these results are based on cross-sectional data, a longitudinal explanation is precarious. Individual differences in mating strategy associated with the probability of having a partnership of shorter or longer duration at the time of the survey may account for some part of the findings. This possibility set aside, post hoc explanations for the results as reflecting a modal time course of partnership are evaluated with regard to habituation, routine, gender role prescriptions, and polarization of roles. In addition, an explanation from evolutionary psychology is offered, entailing the following ideas: the psychological mechanisms of attachment in an adult pair bond have evolved from the parent-child bond. Due to this nonsexual origin, a stable pair-bond does not require high levels of sexual desire, after an initial phase of infatuation has passed. Nevertheless, male sexual desire should stay at a high level because it was selected for in evolutionary history as a precaution against the risk of sperm competition. The course of female sexual desire is assumed to reflect an adaptive function: to boost attachment in order to establish the bond.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 170 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 18 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#617,193
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#349
of 3,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#444
of 127,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.