↓ Skip to main content

ASBMB

A New Tool to Reveal Bacterial Signaling Mechanisms in Antibiotic Treatment and Resistance*

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A New Tool to Reveal Bacterial Signaling Mechanisms in Antibiotic Treatment and Resistance*
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, September 2018
DOI 10.1074/mcp.ra118.000880
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miao-Hsia Lin, Clement M Potel, Kamaleddin H M E Tehrani, Albert J R Heck, Nathaniel I Martin, Simone Lemeer

Abstract

The rapid emergence of antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to human health. Antibiotics modulate a wide range of biological processes in bacteria and as such, the study of bacterial cellular signaling could aid the development of urgently needed new antibiotic agents. Due to the advances in bacterial phosphoproteomics, such a system-wide analysis of bacterial signaling in response to antibiotics has recently become feasible. Here we present a dynamic view of differential protein phosphorylation upon antibiotic treatment and antibiotic resistance. Most strikingly, differential phosphorylation was observed on highly conserved residues of resistance regulating transcription factors, implying a previously unanticipated role of phosphorylation mediated regulation. Using the comprehensive phosphoproteomics data presented here as a resource, future research can now focus on deciphering the precise signaling mechanisms contributing to resistance, eventually leading to alternative strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Librarian 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,125,229
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
#971
of 3,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,245
of 351,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
#25
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.