↓ Skip to main content

Descriptions of Game Actions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Logic, Language and Information, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 179)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Descriptions of Game Actions
Published in
Journal of Logic, Language and Information, June 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1015590229647
Authors

Hans P. van Ditmarsch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 5 38%
Computer Science 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Logic, Language and Information
#21
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,702
of 126,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Logic, Language and Information
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them