↓ Skip to main content

Logics for Epistemic Programs

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Logics for Epistemic Programs
Published in
Synthese, March 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:synt.0000024912.56773.5e
Authors

Alexandru Baltag, Lawrence S. Moss

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 5 11%
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Slovakia 1 2%
Unknown 33 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 14 32%
Computer Science 14 32%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#913
of 2,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,398
of 63,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.