↓ Skip to main content

Defaults in update semantics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
493 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Defaults in update semantics
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00248150
Authors

Frank Veltman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Slovakia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
China 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 84 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 35 36%
Linguistics 28 29%
Computer Science 11 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Mathematics 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 9 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,469,522
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#65
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,300
of 27,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them