| Title |
Microarchitecture of the Radial Head and Its Changes in Aging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Calcified Tissue International, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00223-009-9304-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthias Gebauer, Florian Barvencik, Marcus Mumme, Frank Timo Beil, Eik Vettorazzi, Johannes M. Rueger, Klaus Pueschel, Michael Amling |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 24% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,181,070
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#264
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,383
of 93,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them