↓ Skip to main content

Critical Points and Supersymmetric Vacua I

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Critical Points and Supersymmetric Vacua I
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, October 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00220-004-1228-y
Authors

Michael R. Douglas, Bernard Shiffman, Steve Zelditch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,527,033
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#402
of 2,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,816
of 76,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.