↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy of propranolol in very preterm infants at the risk of retinopathy of prematurity: Which newborn and when?

Overview of attention for article published in International Ophthalmology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
The efficacy of propranolol in very preterm infants at the risk of retinopathy of prematurity: Which newborn and when?
Published in
International Ophthalmology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10792-018-1018-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehmet Adnan Ozturk, Levent Korkmaz

Abstract

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a proliferative vitreoretinopathy resulting from the vascular disorder of the retina, is the most frequent cause of blindness in childhood. In our time, ROP in advanced stage, a serious problem in premature infants, has no other treatment more effective and with fewer side effects than laser photocoagulation (LPC) treatment, which narrows visual field. The search for methods with fewer side effects than LPC has increased in recent times for the treatment of ROP. We aimed to investigate the effects in question of propranolol on ROP in various stages (stages 1, 2, and 3 ROP). This study is designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-centered, double-blind clinical trial with parallel groups. A total of 126 very preterm infants, followed up in our unit from April 2011 to January 2013, were randomly selected and included in our study. They were separated into the groups of 0, 1, and 2 depending on their stage of ROP. In addition, all the patients were divided into control group (CG) and propranolol treatment group (PTG). While the cases in the CG were administered physiological saline solution, the cases in the PTG were administered propranolol (2 mg/kg/day) in the neovascularization phase (second phase) of the ROP. Propranolol given to the group of stage 0-1 ROP was observed to have had no effect on the level of statistical significance between the CG and PTG in terms of increase in ROP stages (p > 0.05). However, propranolol was found to be more useful in patients with stage 2 ROP (p < 0.05). When given in the neovascularization phase of the ROP, propranolol was found to be effective in the stage 2 (advanced stage) ROP patients but in stage 0-1 (early-stage) ROP patients, its efficacy was not sufficient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Librarian 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,782
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#681
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,307
of 341,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.