↓ Skip to main content

Physical Therapy Approaches in the Treatment of Low Back Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Pain and Therapy, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 501)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
40 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
760 Mendeley
Title
Physical Therapy Approaches in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
Published in
Pain and Therapy, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40122-018-0105-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward A. Shipton

Abstract

Globally, in 2016, low back pain (LBP) contributed 57.6 million of total years lived with disability. Low Back Pain Guidelines regularly recommend the use of physical exercise for non-specific LBP. Early non-pharmacological treatment is endorsed. This includes education and self-management, and the recommencement of normal activities and exercise, with the addition of psychological programs in those whose symptoms persist. The aim of physical treatments is to improve function and prevent disability from getting worse. There is no evidence available to show that one type of exercise is superior to another, and participation can be in a group or in an individual exercise program. Active strategies such as exercise are related to decreased disability. Passive methods (rest, medications) are associated with worsening disability, and are not recommended. The Danish, United States of America, and the United Kingdom Guidelines recommend the use of exercise on its own, or in combination with other non-pharmacological therapies. These include tai chi, yoga, massage, and spinal manipulation. Public health programs should educate the public on the prevention of low back pain. In chronic low back pain, the physical therapy exercise approach remains a first-line treatment, and should routinely be used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 760 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 760 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 139 18%
Student > Master 85 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 5%
Other 29 4%
Researcher 28 4%
Other 99 13%
Unknown 343 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 148 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 132 17%
Sports and Recreations 39 5%
Unspecified 14 2%
Social Sciences 10 1%
Other 53 7%
Unknown 364 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#939,330
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Pain and Therapy
#33
of 501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,848
of 352,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain and Therapy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them