↓ Skip to main content

Effect of various food processing and handling methods on preservation of natural antioxidants in fruits and vegetables

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Food Science and Technology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Effect of various food processing and handling methods on preservation of natural antioxidants in fruits and vegetables
Published in
Journal of Food Science and Technology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13197-018-3370-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fahad Al-juhaimi, Kashif Ghafoor, Mehmet Musa Özcan, M. H. A. Jahurul, Elfadil E. Babiker, S. Jinap, F. Sahena, M. S. Sharifudin, I. S. M. Zaidul

Abstract

Bioactive compounds from plant sources are generally categorized as natural antioxidants with well-known health benefits. The health-promoting characteristics of natural antioxidants include anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, and hepatic effects as well as free radical scavenging. Herein, a comprehensive and comparative review are presented about the effects of conventional (thermal and mechanical) and relatively new (non-thermal) processing methods on phytochemicals and discussed the importance of implementing the use of those methods that could be of very helpful retaining the quality of the bioactive compounds in plant-based foods. Plant-based foods rich in phenolics, vitamin C, carotenoids, and other compounds undergo a range of processing operations before they are consumed. Most of these methods involve thermal treatments of fruits, stems, leaves, and roots. These techniques have varying effects on bioactive compounds and their activities, and the magnitude of these effects depends on process parameters such as temperature, time, and the food matrix. Thermal processing can be detrimental to bioactive compounds while nonthermal procedures may not cause significant deterioration of important health-promoting phytochemicals and in some cases can improve their bio-activity and bio-availability. The detrimental effects of conventional processing on the quality of natural antioxidants have been compared to the effects of innovative nonthermal food treatments such as gamma and ultraviolet irradiation, ultraviolet light, pulsed electric fields, and high hydrostatic pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 18%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Researcher 18 7%
Lecturer 11 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 101 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 20%
Engineering 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Chemical Engineering 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 123 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,782
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#1,111
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,936
of 331,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#27
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.