↓ Skip to main content

Role of selected amino acids on plasma IGF-I concentration in infants

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Role of selected amino acids on plasma IGF-I concentration in infants
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00394-015-1105-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manja Fleddermann, Hans Demmelmair, Veit Grote, Martin Bidlingmaier, Philipp Grimminger, Maximilian Bielohuby, Berthold Koletzko

Abstract

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is related to growth and its secretion is modified by protein intake in early infancy. We examined the relationship of dietary protein and circulating amino acids on plasma IGF-I levels and early growth. Healthy formula-fed infants (n = 213) were randomly assigned to receive either a protein-reduced infant formula with alpha-lactalbumin-enriched whey and free tryptophan and phenylalanine (IF) or an isocaloric standard formula without free amino acids (CF) for the first 120 days of life. A group of breastfed (BF) infants was studied as a non-randomized reference cohort. Biochemical variables were measured shortly after birth (subpopulation) and at an age of 120 days. A path analysis was used to explore the relationship between IGF-I, insulin and amino acids. Results are derived from secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial. Plasma concentrations of IGF-I at 120 days were significantly higher in IF than in CF infants [58.5 (15.0) vs. 53.7 (9.95) ng/mL; p = 0.020]. BF infants showed lower IGF-I concentrations of 41.6 (10.7) ng/mL. All amino acids but Thr and Cit had a more marked effect on insulin than on IGF-I level. Considering weight, sex and feeding group, Trp explained an equal percentage of variance of IGF-I and insulin (total R (2) 12.5 % of IGF-I and 12.3 % of insulin), while branched-chain AA explained an up to twofold higher variance of insulin than IGF-I. Compared to CF, IF explained 18.9 % of the IGF-I level (p = 0.03), while for insulin no direct effect was detectable. Higher IGF-I concentrations and growth velocities in infants receiving protein-reduced IF indicate that the protein concentration of an infant formula alone does not control IGF-I levels and growth. Other components (e.g., selected amino acids) of infant formulae might control directly or indirectly via insulin influence IGF-I.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 28 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 34 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,351,847
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,717
of 2,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,219
of 387,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#48
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.