↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors for Postoperative Chylothorax After Radical Subtotal Esophagectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Risk Factors for Postoperative Chylothorax After Radical Subtotal Esophagectomy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6640-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Ohkura, Masaki Ueno, Junichi Shindoh, Toshiro Iizuka, Hairin Ka, Harushi Udagawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,781,659
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,274
of 6,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,557
of 331,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#76
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.