↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Experience of Stigma for Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Role Stigma Plays in Families’ Lives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the Experience of Stigma for Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Role Stigma Plays in Families’ Lives
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2637-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sydney H. Kinnear, Bruce G. Link, Michelle S. Ballan, Ruth L. Fischbach

Abstract

Stigma is widely perceived in the lives of families with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) yet large, systematic studies have not been undertaken. Following Link and Phelan's (Ann Rev Sociol 27:363-385, 2001) model, this study of 502 Simons Simplex Collection families details how different factors contribute to stigma and how each appears to increase the overall difficulty of raising a child with ASD. The model begins with the child's behavioral symptoms and then specifies stigma processes of stereotyping, rejection, and exclusion. Autism behaviors contribute both to the difficulty families experience raising a child with autism and to the stigma processes associated with those behaviors. Stigma also plays a significant role (.282, p < .001) in predicting how difficult life is overall for parents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 450 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 18%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 10%
Researcher 29 6%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 126 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 144 32%
Social Sciences 63 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 7%
Arts and Humanities 10 2%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 131 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,836,120
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,250
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,679
of 395,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#22
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.