↓ Skip to main content

Medicaid expansion and access to care among cancer survivors: a baseline overview

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,039)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Medicaid expansion and access to care among cancer survivors: a baseline overview
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11764-015-0504-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wafa W. Tarazi, Cathy J. Bradley, David W. Harless, Harry D. Bear, Lindsay M. Sabik

Abstract

Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act facilitates access to care among vulnerable populations, but 21 states have not yet expanded the program. Medicaid expansions may provide increased access to care for cancer survivors, a growing population with chronic conditions. We compare access to health care services among cancer survivors living in non-expansion states to those living in expansion states, prior to Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. We use the 2012 and 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to estimate multiple logistic regression models to compare inability to see a doctor because of cost, having a personal doctor, and receiving an annual checkup in the past year between cancer survivors who lived in non-expansion states and survivors who lived in expansion states. Cancer survivors in non-expansion states had statistically significantly lower odds of having a personal doctor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.76, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.92, p < 0.05) and higher odds of being unable to see a doctor because of cost (AOR 1.14, 95 % CI 0.98-1.31, p < 0.10). Statistically significant differences were not found for annual checkups. Prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act, cancer survivors living in expansion states had better access to care than survivors living in non-expansion states. Failure to expand Medicaid could potentially leave many cancer survivors with limited access to routine care. Existing disparities in access to care are likely to widen between cancer survivors in Medicaid non-expansion and expansion states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Social Sciences 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#546,432
of 23,707,131 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#21
of 1,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,838
of 392,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,707,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.