| Title |
Sequential surgical signatures in micro-suturing task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11548-018-1775-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arnaud Huaulmé, Kanako Harada, Germain Forestier, Mamoru Mitsuishi, Pierre Jannin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,321,093
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#13
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,943
of 325,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.