| Title |
Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10195-011-0144-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincenzo Alecci, Maurizio Valente, Marina Crucil, Matteo Minerva, Chiara-Martina Pellegrino, Dario Davide Sabbadini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,426,857
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#30
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,514
of 118,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.