↓ Skip to main content

How word decoding skill impacts text memory: The centrality deficit and how domain knowledge can compensate

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Dyslexia, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
How word decoding skill impacts text memory: The centrality deficit and how domain knowledge can compensate
Published in
Annals of Dyslexia, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11881-009-0025-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda C. Miller, Janice M. Keenan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 41%
Social Sciences 16 24%
Linguistics 5 7%
Computer Science 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#12,646,707
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Dyslexia
#136
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,239
of 113,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Dyslexia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.