↓ Skip to main content

Phase behaviour of colloidal superballs mixed with non-adsorbing polymers

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal E, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Phase behaviour of colloidal superballs mixed with non-adsorbing polymers
Published in
The European Physical Journal E, September 2018
DOI 10.1140/epje/i2018-11719-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Álvaro González García, Joeri Opdam, Remco Tuinier

Abstract

Inspired by experimental work on colloidal cuboid-polymer dispersions (Rossi et al., Soft Matter, 7, 4139 (2011)) we have theoretically studied the phase behaviour of such mixtures. To that end, free volume theory (FVT) was applied to predict the phase behaviour of mixtures of superballs and non-adsorbing polymer chains in a common solvent. Closed expressions for the thermodynamic properties of a suspension of hard colloidal superballs have been derived, accounting for fluid (F), face-centred cubic (FCC) and simple cubic (SC) phase states. Even though the considered solid phases are approximate, the hard superballs phase diagram semi-quantitatively matches with more evolved methods. The theory developed for the cuboid-polymer mixture reveals a rich phase behaviour, which includes not only isostructural F1-F2 coexistence, but also SC1-SC2 coexistence, several triple coexistences, and even a quadruple-phase coexistence region (F1-F2-SC-FCC). The model proposed offers a tool to asses the stability of cuboid-polymer mixtures in terms of the colloid-to-polymer size ratio.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 54%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 23%
Physics and Astronomy 3 23%
Chemical Engineering 2 15%
Engineering 2 15%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#13,339,171
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal E
#297
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,029
of 342,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal E
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.