↓ Skip to main content

Anatomy and biomechanics of quadratus lumborum

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anatomy and biomechanics of quadratus lumborum
Published in
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, March 2008
DOI 10.1243/09544119jeim266
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Phillips, S Mercer, N Bogduk

Abstract

Various actions on the lumbar spine have been attributed to quadratus lumborum, but they have not been substantiated by quantitative data. The present study was undertaken to determine the magnitude of forces and moments that quadratus lumborum could exert on the lumbar spine. The fascicular anatomy of quadratus lumborum was studied in six embalmed cadavers. For each fascicle, the sites of attachment, orientation, and physiological cross-sectional area were determined. The fascicular anatomy varied considerably, between sides and between specimens, with respect to the number of fascicles, their prevalence, and their sizes. Approximately half of the fascicles act on the twelfth rib, and the rest act on the lumbar spine. The more consistently present fascicles were incorporated, as force-equivalents, into a model of quadratus lumborum in order to determine its possible actions. The magnitudes of the compression forces exerted by quadratus lumborum on the lumbar spine, the extensor moment, and the lateral bending moment, were each no greater than 10 per cent of those exerted by erector spinae and multifidus. These data indicate that quadratus lumborum has no more than a modest action on the lumbar spine, in quantitative terms. Its actual role in spinal biomechanics has still to be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 118 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 17 14%
Other 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 29%
Sports and Recreations 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Engineering 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,986,161
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
#588
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,623
of 95,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.