↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and frequency of self-perceived systemic features in people with joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence and frequency of self-perceived systemic features in people with joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10067-018-4296-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cliffton Chan, Anne Krahe, Yim Tang Lee, Leslie L. Nicholson

Abstract

Some commonly reported systemic features of joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS)/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type (EDS-HT) are absent from nosologies due to insufficient validity. The primary aim was to examine the hypothesised high prevalence and frequency of orthostatic intolerance, easy bruising, and urinary incontinence in adults with JHS/EDS-HT and secondarily to determine the association between extent of generalised joint hypermobility (GJH) and these systemic features. A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted via online recruitment of medically diagnosed JHS/EDS-HT patients. A survey collected demographic data and clinical history. A subgroup of participants underwent physical testing of GJH using the Beighton score and Lower Limb Assessment Score (LLAS). Descriptive analysis was performed on demographic data and self-reported non-musculoskeletal systemic features. Correlation of GJH scores and systemic features were performed using Spearman's rank correlation. The survey was completed by 116 individuals (95% female; 16-68 years) with 57 (93% female) also participating in the physical assessment. The most prevalent systemic feature was orthostatic intolerance (98%), followed by easy bruising and urinary incontinence (97% and 84% respectively). Of those reporting symptoms of orthostatic intolerance, easy bruising, and urinary incontinence, 58%, 40%, and 18% described them as very highly frequent respectively (frequency > 75%). No significant correlations were found between the extent of systemic features and GJH scores as measured by either the Beighton score or the LLAS. The high prevalence and frequency of the systemic features found in this study, which are omitted in diagnostic classification criteria, suggest that further research on their diagnostic accuracy is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 20%
Arts and Humanities 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,668,061
of 25,081,505 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#670
of 3,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,555
of 347,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#12
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.